Compare For Traders (forex/CFD) and Lark Funding (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
For Traders |
Lark Funding |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.0★ (1,640 reviews) | 4.4★ (603 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 80% | 80–90% |
| Evaluation types | Instant, 1 Step, 2 Steps, 3 Steps | 1 Step, 3 Steps, Instant |
| Account sizes | $3K, $6K, $15K, $25K, $50K, $100K | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $23 | $105 |
| Drawdown type | Static | Static / Trailing |
| Platforms | MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker | cTrader, DXtrade, Match-Trader |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly / On-demand | Every 14 days / First on demand, then every 30 days |
| News trading | Restricted | Allowed |
| Automated trading / EAs | Restricted | Allowed |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Restricted |
Lark Funding offers a higher advertised profit split (90% vs 80%). For Traders is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $23 compared to $105 at Lark Funding. Both firms support 3 trading platforms.
See how much it truly costs to get funded at For Traders, including multiple failed attempts.
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$178
2 attempts × $89 fee
$178
No fee refund on this plan
3.30%
Profit needed on $6K after 90% split
💡 Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.