Compare FTMO (forex/CFD) and FundingPips (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
FTMO |
FundingPips |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.8★ (53,143 reviews) | 4.5★ (69,366 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 90% | 60–100% |
| Evaluation types | 1 Step, 2 Steps | 2 Steps, 1 Step, Instant |
| Account sizes | $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | €79 | $33 |
| Drawdown type | Static | Static / Trailing |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, cTrader | MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker |
| Payout frequency | 14 days from first trading day | Bi-weekly / Bi-weekly (monthly option) / Weekly / Configurable (weekly / bi-weekly / monthly / on-demand) |
| News trading | Allowed | Not allowed |
| Automated trading / EAs | Allowed | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Not allowed |
FundingPips offers a higher advertised profit split (100% vs 90%). FundingPips is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $33 compared to €79 at FTMO. FundingPips supports more trading platforms (4 vs 3).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at FTMO, including multiple failed attempts.
€199
90%
$25K
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
€398
2 attempts × €199 fee
€398
No fee refund on this plan
1.77%
Profit needed on $25K after 90% split
Fees shown in EUR. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.