Compare For Traders (forex/CFD) and FundingPips (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
For Traders |
FundingPips |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.0★ (1,640 reviews) | 4.5★ (61,136 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 80% | 60–100% |
| Evaluation types | 1 Step, Instant, 3 Steps, 2 Steps | 2 Steps, 1 Step, Instant |
| Account sizes | $3K, $6K, $15K, $25K, $50K, $100K | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $23 | $29 |
| Drawdown type | Static | Static / Trailing |
| Platforms | MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker | MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker |
| Payout frequency | On-demand / Bi-weekly | Bi-weekly / Configurable (weekly / bi-weekly / monthly / on-demand) / Weekly |
| News trading | Restricted | Allowed |
| Automated trading / EAs | Restricted | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Allowed |
FundingPips offers a higher advertised profit split (100% vs 80%). For Traders is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $23 compared to $29 at FundingPips. FundingPips supports more trading platforms (4 vs 3).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at For Traders, including multiple failed attempts.
$89
90%
$6K
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$178
2 attempts × $89 fee
$178
No fee refund on this plan
3.30%
Profit needed on $6K after 90% split
Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.