Compare For Traders (forex/CFD) and FundingPips (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
For Traders |
FundingPips |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | N/A | 4.5★ (69,366 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 80% | 80% |
| Evaluation types | 1 Step, Instant, 2 Steps | 2 Steps, 1 Step, Instant |
| Account sizes | $3K, $6K, $15K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $49 Pay-later option: $29 + $189 activation
|
$33 |
| Drawdown type | Trailing / Static | Static / Trailing |
| Platforms | MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker | MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker |
| Payout frequency | On-demand / Bi-weekly | Bi-weekly / Bi-weekly (monthly option) / Weekly / Configurable (weekly / bi-weekly / monthly / on-demand) |
| News trading | Restricted | Not allowed |
| Automated trading / EAs | Restricted | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Not allowed |
Both firms advertise the same maximum profit split (80%). FundingPips is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $33 compared to $49 at For Traders. FundingPips supports more trading platforms (4 vs 3).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at For Traders, including multiple failed attempts.
$138
70%
$6K
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$276
2 attempts × $138 fee
$276
No fee refund on this plan
6.57%
Profit needed on $6K after 70% split
Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.