Compare FundedNext (forex/CFD) and Lark Funding (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
FundedNext |
Lark Funding |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.6★ (72,245 reviews) | 4.4★ (603 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 80–95% | 80–90% |
| Evaluation types | 2 Steps, 1 Step, Instant | 3 Steps, 1 Step, Instant |
| Account sizes | $2K, $5K, $6K, $10K, $15K, $20K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $32.99 | $105 |
| Drawdown type | Static / Trailing | Static / Trailing |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, cTrader, Match Trader | cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly / On-demand | Every 14 days / First on demand, then every 30 days |
| News trading | Allowed | Allowed |
| Automated trading / EAs | Restricted | Allowed |
| Weekend holding | Restricted | Restricted |
FundedNext offers a higher advertised profit split (95% vs 90%). FundedNext is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $32.99 compared to $105 at Lark Funding. FundedNext supports more trading platforms (4 vs 3).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at FundedNext, including multiple failed attempts.
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$299.98
2 attempts × $149.99 fee
$299.98
No fee refund on this plan
7.50%
Profit needed on $5K after 80% split
💡 Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.