Compare FundingPips (forex/CFD) and Lark Funding (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
FundingPips |
Lark Funding |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.5★ (69,366 reviews) | 4.3★ (524 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 80% | 80% |
| Evaluation types | 2 Steps, 1 Step, Instant | 1 Step, Instant, 3 Steps |
| Account sizes | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $33 | $99 |
| Drawdown type | Static / Trailing | Static / Trailing |
| Platforms | MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker | cTrader, DXtrade, Match-Trader |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly / Bi-weekly (monthly option) / Weekly / Configurable (weekly / bi-weekly / monthly / on-demand) | Every 14 days / First on demand, then every 30 days |
| News trading | Not allowed | Allowed |
| Automated trading / EAs | Restricted | Allowed |
| Weekend holding | Not allowed | Restricted |
Both firms advertise the same maximum profit split (80%). FundingPips is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $33 compared to $99 at Lark Funding. FundingPips supports more trading platforms (4 vs 3).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at FundingPips, including multiple failed attempts.
$88
95%
$10K
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$176
2 attempts × $88 fee
$176
No fee refund on this plan
1.85%
Profit needed on $10K after 95% split
Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.