Compare Lark Funding (forex/CFD) and QT Funded (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
Lark Funding |
QT Funded |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.4★ (603 reviews) | 4.0★ (12,832 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 80–90% | 80–100% |
| Evaluation types | 3 Steps, 1 Step, Instant | 1 Step, 2 Steps, Instant |
| Account sizes | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K | $2.5K, $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $105 | $10 |
| Drawdown type | Static / Trailing | Trailing / Static |
| Platforms | cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader | TradeLocker, cTrader, MT5 |
| Payout frequency | Every 14 days / First on demand, then every 30 days | Every 14 days / On-demand |
| News trading | Allowed | Restricted |
| Automated trading / EAs | Allowed | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Restricted | Allowed |
QT Funded offers a higher advertised profit split (100% vs 90%). QT Funded is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $10 compared to $105 at Lark Funding. Both firms support 3 trading platforms.
See how much it truly costs to get funded at Lark Funding, including multiple failed attempts.
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$800
2 attempts × $400 fee
$800
No fee refund on this plan
8.89%
Profit needed on $10K after 90% split
💡 Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.