Compare Audacity Capital (forex/CFD) and PipFarm (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
Audacity Capital |
PipFarm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 3.4★ (1,073 reviews) | 4.0★ (394 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 75–90% | 70–99% |
| Evaluation types | 2 Steps, 1 Step, Instant | 1 Step, 2 Steps, Instant |
| Account sizes | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K | $2.5K, $5K, $10K, $20K, $50K, $100K, $150K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $49 | $25 |
| Drawdown type | — | Static |
| Platforms | MT5, DXtrade | cTrader |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly, same-day processing / On 10% target, same-day processing | 30 days (14/7-day add-ons) |
| News trading | Restricted | Allowed |
| Automated trading / EAs | Allowed | Allowed |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | — |
PipFarm offers a higher advertised profit split (99% vs 90%). PipFarm is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $25 compared to $49 at Audacity Capital. Audacity Capital supports more trading platforms (2 vs 1).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at Audacity Capital, including multiple failed attempts.
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$558
2 attempts × $279 fee
$558
No fee refund on this plan
6.98%
Profit needed on $10K after 80% split
💡 Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.