Compare PipFarm (forex/CFD) and QT Funded (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
PipFarm |
QT Funded |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.0★ (394 reviews) | 4.0★ (12,832 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 70–99% | 80–100% |
| Evaluation types | 1 Step, Instant, 2 Steps | 2 Steps, Instant, 1 Step |
| Account sizes | $2.5K, $5K, $10K, $20K, $50K, $100K, $150K | $2.5K, $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $25 | $10 |
| Drawdown type | Static | Static / Trailing |
| Platforms | cTrader | TradeLocker, cTrader, MT5 |
| Payout frequency | 30 days (14/7-day add-ons) | Every 14 days / On-demand |
| News trading | Allowed | Restricted |
| Automated trading / EAs | Allowed | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | — | Allowed |
QT Funded offers a higher advertised profit split (100% vs 99%). QT Funded is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $10 compared to $25 at PipFarm. QT Funded supports more trading platforms (3 vs 1).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at PipFarm, including multiple failed attempts.
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$200
2 attempts × $100 fee
$200
No fee refund on this plan
5.71%
Profit needed on $5K after 70% split
💡 Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.