Compare Audacity Capital (forex/CFD) and QT Funded (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
Audacity Capital |
QT Funded |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | N/A | 3.6★ (13,242 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 75% | 80% |
| Evaluation types | 2 Steps, 1 Step, Instant | 1 Step, Instant, 2 Steps |
| Account sizes | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $49 | $35 Pay-later option: $2.50 + $70 activation
|
| Drawdown type | Static / Trailing daily / static max | Static / Trailing |
| Platforms | MT5, DXtrade | TradeLocker, cTrader, MT5 |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly / At each 10% target | Every 4 days / Every 14 days |
| News trading | Restricted | Allowed |
| Automated trading / EAs | Restricted | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Allowed |
QT Funded offers a higher advertised profit split (80% vs 75%). QT Funded is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $35 compared to $49 at Audacity Capital. QT Funded supports more trading platforms (3 vs 2).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at Audacity Capital, including multiple failed attempts.
$279
50%
$10K
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$558
2 attempts × $279 fee
$558
No fee refund on this plan
11.16%
Profit needed on $10K after 50% split
Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.