Compare FundingPips (forex/CFD) and PipFarm (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
FundingPips |
PipFarm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.5★ (61,136 reviews) | 4.0★ (394 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 60–100% | 70–99% |
| Evaluation types | 2 Steps, 1 Step, Instant | 1 Step, Instant, 2 Steps |
| Account sizes | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K | $2.5K, $5K, $10K, $20K, $50K, $100K, $150K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $29 | $25 |
| Drawdown type | Static / Trailing | Static |
| Platforms | MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker | cTrader |
| Payout frequency | Weekly / Configurable (weekly / bi-weekly / monthly / on-demand) / Bi-weekly | 30 days (14/7-day add-ons) |
| News trading | Allowed | Allowed |
| Automated trading / EAs | Restricted | Allowed |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | — |
FundingPips offers a higher advertised profit split (100% vs 99%). PipFarm is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $25 compared to $29 at FundingPips. FundingPips supports more trading platforms (4 vs 1).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at FundingPips, including multiple failed attempts.
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$176
2 attempts × $88 fee
$176
No fee refund on this plan
1.85%
Profit needed on $10K after 95% split
💡 Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.