Compare Lucid Trading (futures) and MENT Funding Futures (futures) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
Lucid Trading |
MENT Funding Futures |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.3★ (6,028 reviews) | 4.7★ (233 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 90% | 75% |
| Evaluation types | 1 Step, Instant | 1 Step |
| Account sizes | $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K | $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K, $400K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $89 | $250 |
| Drawdown type | EOD (evaluation); intraday when funded / EOD | Static |
| Platforms | NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, ATAS, Jigsaw Daytradr, MotiveWave, MultiCharts, R Trader Pro, Tradesea | R Trader Pro, DXtrade Futures |
| Payout frequency | Daily / No payout windows / Every 5 profitable days per cycle / From 5 minimum days to payout | Monthly (first after target and consistency are met) |
| News trading | — | Allowed |
| Automated trading / EAs | — | Allowed |
| Weekend holding | — | Not allowed |
Lucid Trading offers a higher advertised profit split (90% vs 75%). Lucid Trading is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $89 compared to $250 at MENT Funding Futures. Lucid Trading supports more trading platforms (12 vs 2).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at Lucid Trading, including multiple failed attempts.
$515
90%
$50K
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$1,030
2 attempts × $515 fee
$1,030
No fee refund on this plan
2.29%
Profit needed on $50K after 90% split
Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.