Compare Lucid Trading (futures) and Take Profit Trader (futures) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
Lucid Trading |
Take Profit Trader |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.3★ (6,028 reviews) | 4.4★ (10,705 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 90% | 80% (PRO) / 90% (PRO+) |
| Evaluation types | 1 Step, Instant | 1 Step |
| Account sizes | $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K | $25K, $50K, $75K, $100K, $150K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $89 | $150 |
| Drawdown type | EOD | EOD trailing |
| Platforms | NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, ATAS, Jigsaw Daytradr, MotiveWave, MultiCharts, R Trader Pro, Tradesea | NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower, Bookmap, ATAS, Jigsaw Daytradr, MotiveWave, MultiCharts, Finamark, Investor/RT, R Trader, Trade Navigator, VolFix |
| Payout frequency | No payout windows / From 5 minimum days to payout | From day one of the PRO account |
| News trading | — | Restricted |
Both firms advertise the same maximum profit split (90%). Lucid Trading is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $89 compared to $150 at Take Profit Trader. Take Profit Trader supports more trading platforms (14 vs 12).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at Lucid Trading, including multiple failed attempts.
$515
90%
$50K
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$1,030
2 attempts × $515 fee
$1,030
No fee refund on this plan
2.29%
Profit needed on $50K after 90% split
Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.