Compare FXIFY Futures (futures) and Lucid Trading (futures) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
FXIFY Futures |
Lucid Trading |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 3.9★ (41 reviews) | 4.3★ (6,028 reviews) |
| Max profit split | Up to 100% | 90% |
| Evaluation types | Instant, 1 Step | 1 Step, Instant |
| Account sizes | $15K, $30K, $50K, $60K, $80K, $100K, $150K | $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $89 | $89 |
| Drawdown type | Static (4%) / EOD trailing (locks at initial balance) | EOD |
| Platforms | NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView | NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, ATAS, Jigsaw Daytradr, MotiveWave, MultiCharts, R Trader Pro, Tradesea |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly / Bi-weekly (first after 14 days) | No payout windows / From 5 minimum days to payout |
FXIFY Futures offers a higher advertised profit split (100% vs 90%). Both firms have similar entry fees, starting around $89. Lucid Trading supports more trading platforms (12 vs 3).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at FXIFY Futures, including multiple failed attempts.
$399
90%
$30K
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$798
2 attempts × $399 fee
$798
No fee refund on this plan
2.96%
Profit needed on $30K after 90% split
Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.