Compare FTMO Futures (futures) and Lucid Trading (futures) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
FTMO Futures |
Lucid Trading |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.8★ (53,143 reviews) | 4.3★ (6,028 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 90% | 90% |
| Evaluation types | 1 Step | 1 Step, Instant |
| Account sizes | $50K, $100K, $150K | $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $119 | $89 |
| Drawdown type | EOD trailing | EOD (evaluation); intraday when funded / EOD |
| Platforms | Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView | NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, ATAS, Jigsaw Daytradr, MotiveWave, MultiCharts, R Trader Pro, Tradesea |
| Payout frequency | Every 5 days / Every 4 days | Daily / From 5 minimum days to payout / Every 5 profitable days per cycle / No payout windows |
| News trading | — | Allowed |
| Automated trading / EAs | — | Allowed |
| Weekend holding | — | Not allowed |
Both firms advertise the same maximum profit split (90%). Lucid Trading is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $89 compared to $119 at FTMO Futures. Lucid Trading supports more trading platforms (12 vs 3).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at FTMO Futures, including multiple failed attempts.
$169
90%
$100K
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$338
2 attempts × $169 fee
$338
No fee refund on this plan
0.38%
Profit needed on $100K after 90% split
Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.