Compare For Traders (forex/CFD) and MENT Funding (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
For Traders |
MENT Funding |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.0★ (1,640 reviews) | 4.8★ (231 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 80% | 75–90% |
| Evaluation types | Instant, 1 Step, 2 Steps, 3 Steps | 1 Step |
| Account sizes | $3K, $6K, $15K, $25K, $50K, $100K | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K, $400K, $1M, $2M |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $23 | $220 |
| Drawdown type | Static | Static / Trailing |
| Platforms | MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker | DXtrade, Match-Trader, cTrader, GooeyPro, Rithmic, ATAS, DXFutures |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly / On-demand | On-demand / Monthly |
| News trading | Restricted | Restricted |
| Automated trading / EAs | Restricted | Allowed |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Restricted |
MENT Funding offers a higher advertised profit split (90% vs 80%). For Traders is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $23 compared to $220 at MENT Funding. MENT Funding supports more trading platforms (7 vs 3).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at For Traders, including multiple failed attempts.
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$178
2 attempts × $89 fee
$178
No fee refund on this plan
3.30%
Profit needed on $6K after 90% split
💡 Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.