Compare FundingPips (forex/CFD) and MENT Funding (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
FundingPips |
MENT Funding |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.5★ (61,136 reviews) | 4.8★ (231 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 60–100% | 75–90% |
| Evaluation types | 1 Step, 2 Steps, Instant | 1 Step |
| Account sizes | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K, $400K, $1M, $2M |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $29 | $220 |
| Drawdown type | Static / Trailing | Static / Trailing |
| Platforms | MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker | MT4, MT5, cTrader, Match Trader, DXtrade |
| Payout frequency | Configurable (weekly / bi-weekly / monthly / on-demand) / Weekly / Bi-weekly | On-demand / Monthly |
| News trading | Allowed | Restricted |
| Automated trading / EAs | Restricted | Allowed |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Restricted |
FundingPips offers a higher advertised profit split (100% vs 90%). FundingPips is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $29 compared to $220 at MENT Funding. MENT Funding supports more trading platforms (5 vs 4).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at FundingPips, including multiple failed attempts.
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$176
2 attempts × $88 fee
$176
No fee refund on this plan
1.85%
Profit needed on $10K after 95% split
💡 Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.