ATFunded vs QT Funded: Prop Firm Comparison 2026

Compare ATFunded (forex/CFD) and QT Funded (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.

ATFunded review →QT Funded review →

	ATFunded	QT Funded
Trustpilot rating	4.5★ (83 reviews)	4.0★ (12,832 reviews)
Max profit split	75%	80–100%
Evaluation types	1 Step, 2 Steps	Instant, 2 Steps, 1 Step
Account sizes	—	$2.5K, $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K
Cheapest challenge fee	—	$10
Drawdown type	—	Trailing / Static
Platforms	MT5	TradeLocker, cTrader, MT5
Payout frequency	Bi-weekly payouts on a standard cycle	Every 14 days / On-demand
News trading	Not allowed	Restricted
Automated trading / EAs	Allowed	Restricted
Weekend holding	—	Allowed

Verdict

QT Funded offers a higher advertised profit split (100% vs 75%). QT Funded challenge fees start at $10. QT Funded supports more trading platforms (3 vs 1).

ATFunded vs QT Funded — FAQs

Both ATFunded and QT Funded are legitimate prop trading firms, and the better choice depends on your priorities. ATFunded has a higher Trustpilot rating (4.5 vs 4.0). QT Funded offers a higher profit split (100% vs 75%).

QT Funded has the higher advertised profit split at up to 100%, compared to 75% at ATFunded.

QT Funded challenge fees start at $10. Pricing data for ATFunded is not available.

Both firms can be used by beginners, though the right choice depends on your experience level. Both offer 1-step evaluations suited to beginners. QT Funded account sizes: $2.5K, $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K.