ATFunded vs FundingPips: Prop Firm Comparison 2026

Compare ATFunded (forex/CFD) and FundingPips (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.

ATFunded review →FundingPips review →

	ATFunded	FundingPips
Trustpilot rating	4.5★ (83 reviews)	4.5★ (61,136 reviews)
Max profit split	75%	60–100%
Evaluation types	1 Step, 2 Steps	Instant, 2 Steps, 1 Step
Account sizes	—	$5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K
Cheapest challenge fee	—	$29
Drawdown type	—	Trailing / Static
Platforms	MT5	MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
Payout frequency	Bi-weekly payouts on a standard cycle	Bi-weekly / Configurable (weekly / bi-weekly / monthly / on-demand) / Weekly
News trading	Not allowed	Allowed
Automated trading / EAs	Allowed	Restricted
Weekend holding	—	Allowed

Verdict

FundingPips offers a higher advertised profit split (100% vs 75%). FundingPips challenge fees start at $29. FundingPips supports more trading platforms (4 vs 1).

ATFunded vs FundingPips — FAQs

Both ATFunded and FundingPips are legitimate prop trading firms, and the better choice depends on your priorities. Both have a Trustpilot rating of 4.5. FundingPips offers a higher profit split (100% vs 75%).

FundingPips has the higher advertised profit split at up to 100%, compared to 75% at ATFunded.

FundingPips challenge fees start at $29. Pricing data for ATFunded is not available.

Both firms can be used by beginners, though the right choice depends on your experience level. Both offer 1-step evaluations suited to beginners. FundingPips account sizes: $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K.