ATFunded vs FundedNext: Prop Firm Comparison 2026

Compare ATFunded (forex/CFD) and FundedNext (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.

ATFunded review →FundedNext review →

	ATFunded	FundedNext
Trustpilot rating	4.5★ (83 reviews)	4.6★ (72,245 reviews)
Max profit split	75%	80–95%
Evaluation types	1 Step, 2 Steps	2 Steps, 1 Step, Instant
Account sizes	—	$2K, $5K, $6K, $10K, $15K, $20K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K
Cheapest challenge fee	—	$32.99
Drawdown type	—	Static / Trailing
Platforms	MT5	MT4, MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView
Payout frequency	Bi-weekly payouts on a standard cycle	Bi-weekly / On-demand
News trading	Not allowed	Allowed
Automated trading / EAs	Allowed	Restricted
Weekend holding	—	Restricted

Verdict

FundedNext offers a higher advertised profit split (95% vs 75%). FundedNext challenge fees start at $32.99. FundedNext supports more trading platforms (7 vs 1).

ATFunded vs FundedNext — FAQs

Both ATFunded and FundedNext are legitimate prop trading firms, and the better choice depends on your priorities. FundedNext has a higher Trustpilot rating (4.6 vs 4.5). FundedNext offers a higher profit split (95% vs 75%).

FundedNext has the higher advertised profit split at up to 95%, compared to 75% at ATFunded.

FundedNext challenge fees start at $32.99. Pricing data for ATFunded is not available.

Both firms can be used by beginners, though the right choice depends on your experience level. Both offer 1-step evaluations suited to beginners. FundedNext account sizes: $2K, $5K, $6K, $10K, $15K, $20K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K.