Compare AquaFutures (futures) and Lucid Trading (futures) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
AquaFutures |
Lucid Trading |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | N/A | 4.3★ (6,028 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 100% (first $15,000, then 90%) | 90% |
| Evaluation types | 1 Step, Instant | 1 Step, Instant |
| Account sizes | $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K | $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $125 | $89 |
| Drawdown type | EOD Trailing / Intraday Trailing | EOD |
| Platforms | Tradovate, Volumetrica, DeepCharts | NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, ATAS, Jigsaw Daytradr, MotiveWave, MultiCharts, R Trader Pro, Tradesea |
| Payout frequency | After 5 winning days / After 7 winning days | No payout windows / From 5 minimum days to payout |
| News trading | Allowed | — |
AquaFutures offers a higher advertised profit split (100% vs 90%). Lucid Trading is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $89 compared to $125 at AquaFutures. Lucid Trading supports more trading platforms (12 vs 3).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at AquaFutures, including multiple failed attempts.
$572
100%
$50K
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$1,144
2 attempts × $572 fee
$1,144
No fee refund on this plan
2.29%
Profit needed on $50K after 100% split
Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.