Compare Apex Trader Funding (futures) and AquaFutures (futures) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
Apex Trader Funding |
AquaFutures |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.4★ (20,013 reviews) | 3.7★ |
| Max profit split | 90–100% | 100% (first $15,000, then 90%) |
| Evaluation types | 1 Step | 1 Step, Instant |
| Account sizes | $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K | $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $199 | $125 |
| Drawdown type | EOD trailing / Intraday trailing (real-time, incl. unrealized) | EOD Trailing / Intraday Trailing |
| Platforms | NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, Quantower, WealthCharts, TradingView, Sierra Chart, ATAS | Tradovate, Volumetrica, DeepCharts |
| Payout frequency | Every 5 trading days (winning days of $100–$350+ by size) | After 5 winning days / After 7 winning days |
| News trading | — | Allowed |
Both firms advertise the same maximum profit split (100%). AquaFutures is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $125 compared to $199 at Apex Trader Funding. Apex Trader Funding supports more trading platforms (8 vs 3).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at Apex Trader Funding, including multiple failed attempts.
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$49,959,580
2 attempts × $24,979,790 fee
$49,959,580
No fee refund on this plan
99919.16%
Profit needed on $50K after 100% split
💡 Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.