Compare Lucid Trading (futures) and TradersYard (futures) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
Lucid Trading |
TradersYard |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.3★ (6,028 reviews) | — |
| Max profit split | 90% | 90% |
| Evaluation types | 1 Step, Instant | 1 Step |
| Account sizes | $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K | $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $89 | $49 |
| Drawdown type | EOD (evaluation); intraday when funded / EOD | EOD Trailing |
| Platforms | NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, ATAS, Jigsaw Daytradr, MotiveWave, MultiCharts, R Trader Pro, Tradesea | TradersYard Platform, AgenaTrader |
| Payout frequency | Daily / No payout windows / Every 5 profitable days per cycle / From 5 minimum days to payout | Every 10 days |
| News trading | Allowed | Restricted |
| Automated trading / EAs | Allowed | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Not allowed | Not allowed |
Both firms advertise the same maximum profit split (90%). TradersYard is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $49 compared to $89 at Lucid Trading. Lucid Trading supports more trading platforms (12 vs 2).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at Lucid Trading, including multiple failed attempts.
$515
90%
$50K
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$1,030
2 attempts × $515 fee
$1,030
No fee refund on this plan
2.29%
Profit needed on $50K after 90% split
Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.