Compare FTUK Futures (futures) and Lucid Trading (futures) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
FTUK Futures |
Lucid Trading |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 3.8★ (775 reviews) | 4.3★ (6,028 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 90% | 90% |
| Evaluation types | Instant | 1 Step, Instant |
| Account sizes | $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K | $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $409 | $89 |
| Drawdown type | EOD Trailing | EOD (evaluation); intraday when funded / EOD |
| Platforms | FTUK XT | NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, ATAS, Jigsaw Daytradr, MotiveWave, MultiCharts, R Trader Pro, Tradesea |
| Payout frequency | On demand (after a 6% payout target and 5 winning days) | Daily / No payout windows / Every 5 profitable days per cycle / From 5 minimum days to payout |
| News trading | Allowed | Allowed |
| Automated trading / EAs | Not allowed | Allowed |
| Weekend holding | Not allowed | Not allowed |
Both firms advertise the same maximum profit split (90%). Lucid Trading is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $89 compared to $409 at FTUK Futures. Lucid Trading supports more trading platforms (12 vs 1).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at FTUK Futures, including multiple failed attempts.
$595
90%
$50K
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$1,190
2 attempts × $595 fee
$1,190
No fee refund on this plan
2.64%
Profit needed on $50K after 90% split
Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.