Compare For Traders (forex/CFD) and RebelsFunding (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
For Traders |
RebelsFunding |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.0★ (1,640 reviews) | 4.5★ (2,479 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 80% | 75–90% |
| Evaluation types | Instant, 1 Step, 2 Steps, 3 Steps | 4 Steps, 3 Steps, 1 Step, Instant, 2 Steps |
| Account sizes | $3K, $6K, $15K, $25K, $50K, $100K | $1K, $5K, $10K, $20K, $40K, $80K, $160K, $320K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $23 | €9 |
| Drawdown type | Static | Static |
| Platforms | MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker | RF Trader (TradingView) |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly / On-demand | First payout 14 days after first RCF trade ($50 min) |
| News trading | Restricted | — |
| Automated trading / EAs | Restricted | — |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | — |
RebelsFunding offers a higher advertised profit split (90% vs 80%). RebelsFunding is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from €9 compared to $23 at For Traders. For Traders supports more trading platforms (3 vs 1).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at For Traders, including multiple failed attempts.
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$178
2 attempts × $89 fee
$178
No fee refund on this plan
3.30%
Profit needed on $6K after 90% split
💡 Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.