Compare For Traders (forex/CFD) and FunderPro (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
For Traders |
FunderPro |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.0★ (1,640 reviews) | 3.0★ (1,583 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 80% | 80% |
| Evaluation types | Instant, 1 Step, 2 Steps, 3 Steps | Instant, 2 Steps, 1 Step |
| Account sizes | $3K, $6K, $15K, $25K, $50K, $100K | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K, $200K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $23 | $69 |
| Drawdown type | Static | Trailing / Static |
| Platforms | MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker | MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly / On-demand | Bi-weekly / On-demand / Weekly |
| News trading | Restricted | Restricted |
| Automated trading / EAs | Restricted | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Restricted |
Both firms advertise the same maximum profit split (80%). For Traders is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $23 compared to $69 at FunderPro. Both firms support 3 trading platforms.
See how much it truly costs to get funded at For Traders, including multiple failed attempts.
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$178
2 attempts × $89 fee
$178
No fee refund on this plan
3.30%
Profit needed on $6K after 90% split
💡 Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.