Compare Blue Guardian Futures (futures) and Lucid Trading (futures) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
Blue Guardian Futures |
Lucid Trading |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | — | 4.3★ (6,028 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 90% (up to 100% on select plans) | 90% |
| Evaluation types | 1 Step, Instant | 1 Step, Instant |
| Account sizes | $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K | $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $140 | $89 |
| Drawdown type | EOD Trailing / Static | EOD |
| Platforms | DeepCharts, NinjaTrader, TradingView, Tradovate | NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, ATAS, Jigsaw Daytradr, MotiveWave, MultiCharts, R Trader Pro, Tradesea |
| Payout frequency | 3 days after first trade / Meet payout target & consistency | No payout windows / From 5 minimum days to payout |
| News trading | Allowed | — |
Blue Guardian Futures offers a higher advertised profit split (100% vs 90%). Lucid Trading is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $89 compared to $140 at Blue Guardian Futures. Lucid Trading supports more trading platforms (12 vs 4).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at Blue Guardian Futures, including multiple failed attempts.
$599
90%
$100K
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$1,198
2 attempts × $599 fee
$1,198
No fee refund on this plan
1.33%
Profit needed on $100K after 90% split
Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.