Compare BEM Funding (forex/CFD) and QT Funded (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
BEM Funding |
QT Funded |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.2★ (219 reviews) | 4.0★ (12,832 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 80–90% | 80–100% |
| Evaluation types | 2 Steps, 1 Step | 2 Steps, Instant, 1 Step |
| Account sizes | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K | $2.5K, $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $39 | $10 |
| Drawdown type | Trailing / Static | Static / Trailing |
| Platforms | DXtrade, cTrader, MT5 | TradeLocker, cTrader, MT5 |
| Payout frequency | Weekly | Every 14 days / On-demand |
| News trading | — | Restricted |
| Automated trading / EAs | — | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | — | Allowed |
QT Funded offers a higher advertised profit split (100% vs 90%). QT Funded is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $10 compared to $39 at BEM Funding. Both firms support 3 trading platforms.
See how much it truly costs to get funded at BEM Funding, including multiple failed attempts.
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$178
2 attempts × $89 fee
$178
No fee refund on this plan
2.23%
Profit needed on $10K after 80% split
💡 Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.