Compare BEM Funding (forex/CFD) and FundingPips (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
BEM Funding |
FundingPips |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.2★ (219 reviews) | 4.5★ (61,136 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 80–90% | 60–100% |
| Evaluation types | 2 Steps, 1 Step | 2 Steps, 1 Step, Instant |
| Account sizes | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $39 | $29 |
| Drawdown type | Trailing / Static | Static / Trailing |
| Platforms | DXtrade, cTrader, MT5 | MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker |
| Payout frequency | Weekly | Weekly / Configurable (weekly / bi-weekly / monthly / on-demand) / Bi-weekly |
| News trading | — | Allowed |
| Automated trading / EAs | — | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | — | Allowed |
FundingPips offers a higher advertised profit split (100% vs 90%). FundingPips is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $29 compared to $39 at BEM Funding. FundingPips supports more trading platforms (4 vs 3).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at BEM Funding, including multiple failed attempts.
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$178
2 attempts × $89 fee
$178
No fee refund on this plan
2.23%
Profit needed on $10K after 80% split
💡 Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.