Compare AIFO (forex/CFD) and FundingPips (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
AIFO |
FundingPips |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | — | 4.5★ (61,136 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 80% | 60–100% |
| Evaluation types | 2 Steps, 1 Step, Instant | 2 Steps, 1 Step, Instant |
| Account sizes | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $69 | $29 |
| Drawdown type | Static / Trailing | Static / Trailing |
| Platforms | MT5 | MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker |
| Payout frequency | Every 14 days / On-demand | Bi-weekly / Configurable (weekly / bi-weekly / monthly / on-demand) / Weekly |
| News trading | Allowed | Allowed |
| Automated trading / EAs | — | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Allowed |
FundingPips offers a higher advertised profit split (100% vs 80%). FundingPips is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $29 compared to $69 at AIFO. FundingPips supports more trading platforms (4 vs 1).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at AIFO, including multiple failed attempts.
$129
70%
$10K
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$258
2 attempts × $129 fee
$258
No fee refund on this plan
3.69%
Profit needed on $10K after 70% split
Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.