Compare Blueberry Funded (forex/CFD) and FundingPips (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
Blueberry Funded |
FundingPips |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 3.1★ (1,501 reviews) | 4.5★ (61,136 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 80% | 60–100% |
| Evaluation types | 2 Steps, 1 Step, Instant | 2 Steps, 1 Step, Instant |
| Account sizes | $1.25K, $2.5K, $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $30 | $29 |
| Drawdown type | Static | Static / Trailing |
| Platforms | MT5, TradeLocker | MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker |
| Payout frequency | On-demand | Bi-weekly / Configurable (weekly / bi-weekly / monthly / on-demand) / Weekly |
| News trading | Restricted | Allowed |
| Automated trading / EAs | Allowed | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Allowed |
FundingPips offers a higher advertised profit split (100% vs 80%). FundingPips is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $29 compared to $30 at Blueberry Funded. FundingPips supports more trading platforms (4 vs 2).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at Blueberry Funded, including multiple failed attempts.
$65
80%
$2.5K
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$130
2 attempts × $65 fee
$130
No fee refund on this plan
6.50%
Profit needed on $2.5K after 80% split
Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.