Compare Blueberry Funded (forex/CFD) and FundingPips (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
Blueberry Funded |
FundingPips |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | N/A | 4.5★ (69,366 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 80% | 80% |
| Evaluation types | 1 Step, Instant, 2 Steps | 2 Steps, 1 Step, Instant |
| Account sizes | $1.25K, $2.5K, $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $37 | $33 |
| Drawdown type | Static / Trailing (locks at starting balance) | Static / Trailing |
| Platforms | MT5, TradeLocker | MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker |
| Payout frequency | Every 14 days | Bi-weekly / Bi-weekly (monthly option) / Weekly / Configurable (weekly / bi-weekly / monthly / on-demand) |
| News trading | Restricted | Not allowed |
| Automated trading / EAs | Restricted | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Not allowed |
Both firms advertise the same maximum profit split (80%). FundingPips is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $33 compared to $37 at Blueberry Funded. FundingPips supports more trading platforms (4 vs 2).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at Blueberry Funded, including multiple failed attempts.
$65
80%
$2.5K
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$130
2 attempts × $65 fee
$130
No fee refund on this plan
6.50%
Profit needed on $2.5K after 80% split
Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.