Compare Atmos Funded (forex/CFD) and QT Funded (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
Atmos Funded |
QT Funded |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 4.0★ (297 reviews) | 4.0★ (12,832 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 80–90% | 80–100% |
| Evaluation types | 2 Steps, 1 Step, Instant | 1 Step, Instant, 2 Steps |
| Account sizes | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K, $200K | $2.5K, $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $28 Pay-later option: $5 (+ $79 activation on funding)
|
$35 Pay-later option: $12.50 + $70 activation
|
| Drawdown type | Static / Trailing | Static / Trailing |
| Platforms | MT5 | TradeLocker, cTrader, MT5 |
| Payout frequency | Every 14 days / On demand | Every 4 days / Every 14 days |
| News trading | Restricted | Restricted |
| Automated trading / EAs | Restricted | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Allowed |
QT Funded offers a higher advertised profit split (100% vs 90%). Atmos Funded is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $28 compared to $35 at QT Funded. QT Funded supports more trading platforms (3 vs 1).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at Atmos Funded, including multiple failed attempts.
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$248
2 attempts × $124 fee
$248
No fee refund on this plan
2.76%
Profit needed on $10K after 90% split
💡 Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.