Compare Atmos Funded (forex/CFD) and QT Funded (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
Atmos Funded |
QT Funded |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 3.6★ (352 reviews) | 3.6★ (13,242 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 80% | 80% |
| Evaluation types | 1 Step, 2 Steps, Instant | 1 Step, Instant, 2 Steps |
| Account sizes | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K, $200K | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $28 Pay-later option: $5 (+ $79 activation on funding)
|
$35 Pay-later option: $2.50 + $70 activation
|
| Drawdown type | Trailing / Static | Static / Trailing |
| Platforms | MT5 | TradeLocker, cTrader, MT5 |
| Payout frequency | On demand / Every 14 days / Every 14 days (first payout on demand) | Every 4 days / Every 14 days |
| News trading | Restricted | Allowed |
| Automated trading / EAs | Restricted | Restricted |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Allowed |
Both firms advertise the same maximum profit split (80%). Atmos Funded is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $28 compared to $35 at QT Funded. QT Funded supports more trading platforms (3 vs 1).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at Atmos Funded, including multiple failed attempts.
$124
80%
$10K
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$248
2 attempts × $124 fee
$248
No fee refund on this plan
3.10%
Profit needed on $10K after 80% split
Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.