Compare AquaFunded (forex/CFD) and Blue Guardian (forex/CFD) side by side — profit splits, challenge fees, drawdown rules, platforms, and trading restrictions.
AquaFunded |
Blue Guardian |
|
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot rating | 3.1★ (1,436 reviews) | 4.0★ (903 reviews) |
| Max profit split | 90–100% | 80–90% |
| Evaluation types | Instant, 2 Steps, 1 Step, 3 Steps | 1 Step, 2 Steps, 3 Steps, Instant |
| Account sizes | $2.5K, $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K, $200K, $250K, $300K, $400K | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $150K, $200K, $300K, $400K |
| Cheapest challenge fee | $29 | $25 |
| Drawdown type | Trailing / Static | EOD Trailing / Trailing / Static |
| Platforms | Match-Trader, TradeLocker, MT5, cTrader | MT5, Match-Trader, NinjaTrader, TradeLocker, TradingView, Tradovate, Deepcharts |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly | Daily / Weekly / Every 3 days / Instant payouts |
| News trading | Restricted | Restricted |
| Automated trading / EAs | Allowed | — |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Allowed |
AquaFunded offers a higher advertised profit split (100% vs 90%). Blue Guardian is cheaper to enter, with challenge fees from $25 compared to $29 at AquaFunded. Blue Guardian supports more trading platforms (7 vs 4).
See how much it truly costs to get funded at AquaFunded, including multiple failed attempts.
Drag to model your worst-case scenario
$230
2 attempts × $115 fee
$230
No fee refund on this plan
5.11%
Profit needed on $5K after 90% split
💡 Fees shown in USD. Break-even is the minimum profit % you need on your funded account to cover all challenge costs.